Don’t Fall For These Common Property Restoration Myths

There are many misconceptions about the reduction and restoration of land damage. These theories might have been true in the past when technology wasn’t as advanced. However, professional restoration businesses see beyond these fallacies and apply the right course of action to mitigate the harms. If a property owner doesn’t act quickly enough or does not take the ideal action because of these truths, they can end up with even more damage to manage, which could’ve easily been averted. Here are the five common property recovery myths and the truth behind them.

#1: Replacing costs less than restoring

Typically, cleaning and salvaging the contents and construction is really less expensive than replacing them. This can vary with the conditions. Sometimes, replacement is the only option. By way of instance, if after a fire, smoke soot has not been properly cleaned from all surfaces, the damaged contents must be replaced. Yet trained restoration firms ought to be able to successfully wash and eliminate contaminates, preventing high replacement costs.

Moreover, a professional restoration technician will always prioritize mitigation. Mitigation is extremely time-critical since it stops further damage and reduces additional reduction. It usually needs to be performed within 24 hours of the disaster. Any delay will further complicate or devalue the reduction effort.

#2: If you clean your carpets, they will get dirty faster

This was true in the past once the techniques, equipment, and materials were inferior. Inefficient carpet shampooing left a soap residue that attracted dirt more quickly than before cleaning. These days, the carpet cleaning process both flushes and rinses carpeting, preventing that from occurring.

#3: Drying a House is full when the carpets are dry

This misconception is far from the truth since the carpets dry much quicker than structural substances. Thus, the drying process is complete only when all the structural pieces, such as cement flooring and walls, are totally dry. To measure moisture levels, professionals utilize advanced meters and sensors. That is extremely important to accomplish the result — a completely dry structure. The threat with ineffective drying is that it may turn a small loss from water damage into a multi-thousand dollar mold claim.

#4: A fire-damaged home will always smell like smoke, so cleaning it fast is unnecessary

Stories arise about smoke damage restoration efforts that have failed, usually because odor stays. Though smoke soot is a lot more damaging than normal dust or dirt, prompt cleaning can reduce losses if the soot is neutralized. Consequently, if you don’t clean the smoke residue immediately following a fire, then the valuables inside your home may endure irreversible damage, due to the acidic nature of the smoke particles.

Odor removal is more complicated than turning on a machine and expecting to achieve good outcomes. Restoration for smoke odor needs to be methodical. All contaminated areas have to be cleaned, deodorized, and sealed where applicable.

#5: DIY is cheaper than hiring a recovery company

This is true in some cases, but you must be exceedingly cautious. A botched fix can cost you more in the long term. Thus, a restoration company may save you extra expenses. Find out more about the benefits of hiring a professional and the risks of DIY mold removal.

For property damage recovery, call the professionals!

Don’t fall for the house restoration myths! When in doubt, always consult with a trained professional restoration firm, for example, PuroClean. Professionals would be the best assurance in regards to mitigation and restoration. Their constant technical training helps them avoid the flawed theories and mistakes of yesteryear. Using the latest equipment and processes, they are certain the task is done correctly and thoroughly — the first moment. Call your PuroClean Naples office now!